Reply to Robinson

Reply to Robinson.

TO THE EDITOR—We thank Robinson [1] for the comments about our report [2] and for the opportunity to clarify our findings. As we stated in our research protocol (clinical trials registration NCT00500578) in the Materials and Methods section in our report, as well as in our response to Fätkenheuer et al [3], the prespecified significance threshold for declaring one arm superior to the other was ...

Reply to Robinson et al.: Building the evidence base on the forest cover effects of community titling.

We thank Robinson et al. (1) for their thoughtful comments on our article (2). We agree with their main point, which is that our findings about the link between titling and forest cover change are contextand time-specific, and do not necessarily generalize to other countries and other periods. However, it is important to make clear that our article (2): (i ) does not claim to present generaliza...

The Authors’ Reply

The Authors’ Reply

Reply to the Letter to the Editor Reply to

We thank Dr Schachner for his interest and comments on our recent experimental findings [1]. The first facet of our study was that although initially (at 1 month), neointima formation in vein grafts was inhibited by perivenous application of fibrin glue at the time of implantation, at 4 months neointimal formation was not significantly different from controls [1]. Dr Schachner has implied that ...